In Re Milita

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Milita

12 A.3d 205, 205 N.J. 72, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 223

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 15, 2011

DocketD-33 September Term 2010, 067199

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.3d 205 (In Re Milita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Milita, 12 A.3d 205, 205 N.J. 72, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-205, that VINCENT J. MILITA, II, of MARMORA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client informed about status of matter), and RPC 1.5(b) (failure to provide written retainer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that VINCENT J. MILITA, II, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI