In re Milita
This text of 84 A.3d 261 (In re Milita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-159, concluding that MARTIN J. MILITA, JR. of ANNANDALE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);
And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should continue treatment with a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that MARTIN J. MILITA, JR. is hereby censured; and it is further
ORDERED that MARTIN J. MILITA, JR., shall continue treatment with a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, for a period of two years and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.3d 261, 217 N.J. 19, 2014 WL 650145, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-milita-nj-2014.