In the Matter of Mulder

12 A.3d 205, 205 N.J. 71, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 220
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 2011·No. D-30 September Term 2010, 067132·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-212, concluding that WILLIAM H. MULDER of SADDLEBROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (misrepresentation of material fact to a third person), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM H. MULDER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *72 expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Mulder, 12 A.3d 205, 205 N.J. 71, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 220 (N.J. 2011).

12 A.3d 205 (In the Matter of Mulder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Milita
12 A.3d 205 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)