In the Matter of Mulder
This text of 12 A.3d 205 (In the Matter of Mulder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-212, concluding that WILLIAM H. MULDER of SADDLEBROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (misrepresentation of material fact to a third person), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that WILLIAM H. MULDER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual *72 expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.3d 205, 205 N.J. 71, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-mulder-nj-2011.