In re McMillian

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re McMillian

742 S.E.2d 2, 402 S.C. 251, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 115

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 22, 2013

DocketAppellate Case No. 2013-000346; No. 2013-000346

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 S.E.2d 2 (In re McMillian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McMillian, 742 S.E.2d 2, 402 S.C. 251, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 115 (S.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On January 29, 2013, respondent was charged with breach of trust with fraudulent intent involving $2,000 or less. As a result, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

/s/Costa M. Pleicones, Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On January 29, 2013, respondent was charged with breach of trust with fraudulent intent involving $2,000 or less. As a result, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

/s/Costa M. Pleicones, Judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

742 S.E.2d 2, 402 S.C. 251, 2013 S.C. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mcmillian-sc-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack