In re McMillian

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re McMillian

789 S.E.2d 750, 417 S.C. 112, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 236

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedAugust 4, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2015-001163

StatusPublished

This text of 789 S.E.2d 750 (In re McMillian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re McMillian, 789 S.E.2d 750, 417 S.C. 112, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 236 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

By opinion dated June 26, 2013, the Court definitely suspended petitioner from the practice of law for three (3) years, retroactive to February 22, 2013, the date of his interim suspension. In the Matter of McMillian, 404 S.C. 117, 744 S.E.2d 579 (2013). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

[113]*113After thorough consideration of the entire record, the Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

We would deny the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI