In re McMillian

789 S.E.2d 750, 417 S.C. 112, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 236
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 4, 2016·No. Appellate Case No. 2015-001163·Published

Opinion

ORDER

By opinion dated June 26, 2013, the Court definitely suspended petitioner from the practice of law for three (3) years, retroactive to February 22, 2013, the date of his interim suspension. In the Matter of McMillian, 404 S.C. 117, 744 S.E.2d 579 (2013). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

[113] After thorough consideration of the entire record, the Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

We would deny the Petition for Reinstatement.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McMillian, 789 S.E.2d 750, 417 S.C. 112, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 236 (S.C. 2016).

789 S.E.2d 750 (In re McMillian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re McMillian
744 S.E.2d 579 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)