In Re: Lena Marie Lindberg

Opinion

,[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12108

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

In Re: LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-mc-00163-RBD-DCI

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 23-12108

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Lena Lindberg appeals, pro se, from a May 23, 2023, magistrate judge screening order returning her filings and revoking her access to a pro se filing portal. The order, however, is not final or appealable to this Court, as an appeal from a magistrate judge order must be taken to the district court. See United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). Even if the district judge ultimately affirms the order, the subsequent affirmance would not cure Lindberg’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998).

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.