Angela Perez-Priego v. Alachua County Clerk of Court
This text of 148 F.3d 1272 (Angela Perez-Priego v. Alachua County Clerk of Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Angela Perez-Priego appeals the magistrate judge’s report recommending that her civil-rights complaint be dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®.
The magistrate’s report and recommendation had not been adopted by the district court at the time that Perez-Priego filed the notice of appeal and therefore the report and recommendation is not final and appeal-able. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir.1982). Likewise, Perez-Priego’s notice of appeal was not valid to perfect the appeal as of the date of the district court’s judgment. See FirsTier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Ins. Co., 498 U.S. 269, 276, 111 S.Ct. 648, 653, 112 L.Ed.2d 743 (1991); Billingsley v. Jefferson County, 953 F.2d 1351, 1353-54 (11th Cir.1992). .Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 1
. We examine our jurisdiction sua sponte even though neither party has raised the issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 F.3d 1272, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17875, 1998 WL 438820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/angela-perez-priego-v-alachua-county-clerk-of-court-ca11-1998.