Ronald Satish Emrit v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: June 25, 2025
• Docket: 25-11546
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-11546 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-11546 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, a.k.a. Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Plaintiff-Appellant, PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d.b.a. United Emrits of America, Plaintiff, versus UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, (USPTO), UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, (GSFC) in Greenbelt, Maryland, USCA11 Case: 25-11546 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11546

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, (AIP), KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, in Cape Canaveral, Florida, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-00082-JRH-BKE ____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Ronald Emrit, proceeding pro se, appeals from the magistrate judge’s April 16, 2025, report and recommendation that his com- plaint be dismissed. A magistrate judge’s recommendation on a dispositive mat- ter that has not been adopted or otherwise rendered final by the district court at the time the notice of appeal is filed is not final and appealable. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998); 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Moreover, the district court’s subsequent adoption of the recommendation and entry of USCA11 Case: 25-11546 Document: 9-1 Date Filed: 06/25/2025 Page: 3 of 3

25-11546 Opinion of the Court 3

final judgment did not cure Emrit’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego, 148 F.3d at 1273. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.