Ronald Satish Emrit v. Cobb Gonzalez Law Finn of Jacksonville, Florida

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: June 30, 2025
• Docket: 25-11597
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-11597 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/30/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-11597 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Plaintiff-Appellant, PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d.b.a. United Emrits of America, Plaintiff, versus COBB GONZALEZ LAW FIRM OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY COURT, USCA11 Case: 25-11597 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/30/2025 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11597

MANATEE COUNTY COURT, ERIC GOLDFINE TRUST, ERIC GOLDFINE, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:25-cv-00999-WFJ-NHA ____________________

Before NEWSOM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction because it is not taken from a final or immediately appealable or- der. Ronald Emrit, pro se, filed a notice of appeal that appears to seek review of the magistrate judge’s April 29, 2025, report and rec- ommendation that the district court dismiss his complaint. A mag- istrate judge’s recommendation that has not been adopted or oth- erwise rendered final by the district court at the time the notice of appeal is filed is not final and appealable. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998); 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court’s subsequent adoption of the USCA11 Case: 25-11597 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 06/30/2025 Page: 3 of 3

25-11597 Opinion of the Court 3

recommendation and dismissal of the complaint did not cure Emrit’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego, 148 F.3d at 1273. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.