In Re Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases

911 So. 2d 766, 2005 WL 2095664
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2005
DocketSC04-2481
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 911 So. 2d 766 (In Re Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases, 911 So. 2d 766, 2005 WL 2095664 (Fla. 2005).

Opinion

911 So.2d 766 (2005)

In re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES (NO. 2004-1).

No. SC04-2481.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 1, 2005.

Honorable Dedee S. Costello, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Fourteen Judicial Circuit, Panama City, FL, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions (Criminal) petitions this Court to amend the Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The proposed amendments were published in The Florida Bar News, and comments were received in response to proposals one and two only. The proposed amendments are as follows:

Proposal 1: Revised instruction for justifiable use of deadly force.
Proposal 2: Revised instruction for justifiable use of non-deadly force.
Proposal 3: Revised instruction for rules of deliberation.
Proposal 4: Revised instruction for aggravated child abuse.
Proposal 5: Revised instruction for bribery offenses.
Proposal 6: Revised instruction for theft offenses.
Proposal 7: Revised grand jury handbook and grand jury instructions.

We hereby authorize the publication and use of the revised instructions as to Proposal 3, Proposal 4, Proposal 5, Proposal 6 and Proposal 7 as set forth in the appendix attached to this opinion. In light of recent legislation related to the use of deadly force, which will require a complete rewriting of these instructions related to the use of force, we do not approve the publication of the revised instructions as to Proposal 1 and Proposal 2. See ch. 2005-27, Laws of *767 Fla.[1] In doing so, we express no opinion on the correctness of these instructions and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions or contesting the legal correctness of these instructions. We further caution all interested parties that the notes and comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final. New language is indicated by underlining, and deletions are indicated by struck-through type.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

3.10 RULES FOR DELIBERATION

These are some general rules that apply to your discussion. You must follow these rules in order to return a lawful verdict:

1. You must follow the law as it is set out in these instructions. If you fail to follow the law, your verdict will be a miscarriage of justice. There is no reason for failing to follow the law in this case. All of us are depending upon you to make a wise and legal decision in this matter.
2. This case must be decided only upon the evidence that you have heard from the testimony of the witnesses [and have seen in the form of the exhibits in evidence] and these instructions.
3. This case must not be decided for or against anyone because you feel sorry for anyone, or are angry at anyone.
4. Remember, the lawyers are not on trial. Your feelings about them should not influence your decision in this case.

When the jury is to be involved in a penalty phase, omit the second sentence of paragraph 5.

5. Your duty is to determine if the defendant has been proven guilty or not, in accord with the law. It is the judge's job to determine a proper sentence if the defendant is found guilty.
6. Whatever verdict you render must be unanimous, that is, each juror must agree to the same verdict.

Give 7 if applicable

7. It is entirely proper for a lawyer to talk to a witness about what testimony the witness would give if called to the courtroom. The witness should not be discredited by talking to a lawyer about [his][her] testimony.
8. Your verdict should not be influenced by feelings of prejudice, bias or sympathy. Your verdict must be based on the evidence, and on the law contained in these instructions.

16.1 AGGRAVATED CHILD ABUSE

§ 827.03(2), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of aggravated child abuse Aggravated Child Abuse, the *768 State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant)

Give as applicable

a. committed aggravated battery upon (victim).
b. willfully tortured (victim).
c. maliciously punished (victim).
d. willfully and unlawfully caged (victim).
e. knowingly or willfully committed child abuse upon (victim) and in so doing caused great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement.
2. (Victim) was under the age of 18 years.

Definitions: Give as applicable

In order to prove that an aggravated battery was committed, the state State must prove the following:

1. (Defendant) intentionally
a. touched or struck (victim) against the will of (victim).
b. caused bodily harm to (victim).
2. In so doing, (defendant) intentionally or knowingly caused [great bodily harm] [permanent disability] [permanent disfigurement] or [used a deadly weapon].

A weapon is a "deadly weapon" if it is used or threatened to be used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm.

"Willfully" means knowingly, intentionally, and purposely.

"Maliciously" meansdone from ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent wrongfully, intentionally, and without legal justification or excuse. Maliciousness may be established by circumstances from which one could conclude that a reasonable parent would not have engaged in the damaging acts toward the child for any valid reason and that the primary purpose of the acts was to cause the victim unjustifiable pain or injury.

Give in all cases if 1(e) is alleged

"Child Abuse" means [the intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child] [an intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child] [active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child].

19.1 BRIBERY OF PUBLIC SERVANT

§ 838.015(1), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Bribery of a Public Servant, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Person bribed) was a (office of person bribed).
2. (Defendant) [gave] [offered] [promised] to (person bribed) the thing described in the charge in this case as (read from charge).
3. The (read from charge) was something of value, benefit, or advantage to [(person bribed)] [a person in whose welfare (person bribed) was interested] not authorized by law.
4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-02.
256 So. 3d 1316 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2016-10
214 So. 3d 1290 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-04
190 So. 3d 614 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report No. 2012-04
131 So. 3d 720 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report No. 2009-01
27 So. 3d 640 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-No. 2007-11
986 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re Standard Jury Inst. in Crim. Cases No. 2007-03
976 So. 2d 1081 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re Jury Inst. in Cr. Cases (No. 2005-4)
930 So. 2d 612 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
In Re Jury Inst. in Cr. Cases (No. 2004-1)
915 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
911 So. 2d 766, 2005 WL 2095664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jury-instructions-in-crim-cases-fla-2005.