In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2016-10

214 So. 3d 1290
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 2017
DocketSC16-1884
StatusPublished

This text of 214 So. 3d 1290 (In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2016-10) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—report 2016-10, 214 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted a report proposing amendments to seven existing standard criminal jury instructions. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amending existing instructions: 19.1 (Bribery of a Public Servant); 19.2 (Bribery by a Public Servant); 19.3 (Unlawful Compensation or Reward to Public Servant for Official Behavior); 19.4 (Unlawful Compensation or Reward by Public Servant for Official Behavior); 19.5 (Unlawful Compensation or Reward to Public Servant for Official Behavior); 19.6 (Unlawful Compensation or Reward by Public Servant for Official Behavior); and 19.7 (Official Misconduct). 1 The changes proposed by the Committee primarily stem from the enactment of chapter 2016-151, Laws of Florida, which revised chapter 838 (Bribery; Misuse of Public Office) of the Florida Statutes. The enactment of chapter 2016-151, Laws of Florida, among other things, changed the type of mens rea necessary for a violation of chapter 838 from “corruptly” to “knowingly and intentionally.” It also amended section 838.014, Florida Statutes (2016), to include definitions, for the phrases “Governmental entity” and “Public contractor.” Ch. 2016-151, § 1, Laws of Fla.

Before filing its report with the Court, the Committee published its proposals for comment. No comments were received. The Court did not republish the Committee’s proposals for comment. Having considered the Committee’s report, we hereby authorize for publication and use instructions 19.1 through 19.7 as proposed by the Committee.

Accordingly, the instructions, as set forth in the appendix to this opinion, are authorized for publication and use. 2 In authorizing the publication and use of these instructions, we express no .opinion on their correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We further *1291 caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. New language is indicated by underlining and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Attachment

Appendix

19.1 BRIBERY OF A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.015(1), Fla._Stat.

To prove the crime of Bribery of a Public Servant, the State must prove the following feurfive elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Person bribed-) was a (office'of nernonbribBd). Asíame of public-, servant) was a public servant.

2. (Defendant) {gave] [offered] [promised]-tn-(pemonrbribed)-the thing describedrin-the charge in this-case tus-fread from ohargelknew that (name of public servant) was a public servant.

3. The (road fir-em-charge) was somcthing-ef-valuc, benefit^ or a-dvnntage-to-[(poraon bribod-)j-[n person-in whoso welfare -(persea bribed) was-mterestedl -not authorized-bylaw. (Defendant) knowingly and intentionally [gavel [offered! fnromisedl (name of public servant) a pecuniary or other benefit.

4. The [gift] [offor] [promise] was made-for the purpose of corruptly influencing (person bribedjHn the performance of somc act or omission that

Give- 4a or-4b as-ap-plicable.

⅜-[(defendant) believed to be

[within-the-official-discretion of-(person bribed)];]

[in violation of a-public duty of-(person bribed)].]

[in performance of a public duty of (person bribed)].]

fe-[(person bribed) represented as-being

[withm-[his] [her]-official discretion];]

[in violation of [his] [her] public-duty].]

[inperformance of-[his] [her] public duty].]

(Defendant’s) igiffl fofieri Tpromisel was made with the intent or purpose to influence (name of public servant) in the performance of any act [or omission! that

*1292 Give 4a or 4b as applicable.

a. ('defendant') believed to be [within the official discretion of

(name of public servant!! fin violation of a public duty of

(name of public servant-)! fin performance of a public duty of

(name of -public servant)!.

b. (name of public servant) represented as being [within fhisl

fherl official discretion! [in violation of fhisl fherl public

dutvl fin performance of fhisl fherl public dutvl

5. The pecuniary or other benefit was not authorized bv law.

Definitions^

§ 838.011(6), FiavStat-.-

“ Corruptly—moans acting knowingfy-and dishonestly for a wrongful purposer

The-court-now instructs you-that-a (office of person bribed) is a public servant.-

$ 838.014Í7)(a). Fla. Stat.

“Public servant” means any officer or employee of a governmental entity, including any executive. legislative, or judicial branch officer or employee.

Give if applicable. $ 838.014f7)(b) and (7)(c). Fla. Stat.

“Public servant” also includes any person, except a witness, who acts as a general or special magistrate, receiver, auditor, arbitrator, umpire, referee-consultant. or hearing officer while performing a governmental function or a candidate for election or appointment to any of these officer positions: or an individual who has been elected to. but has vet to officially assume the responsibilities of. public office.

$ 838.014(4). Fla. Stat

“Governmental entity” means an agency or entity of the state, a county, municipality, or special district or anv other public entity created or authorized bv law.

Give the following three paragraphs to explain “a pecuniary or other benefit not authorized bv law ” in element #5. CzaikowsM v. State, 178 So. 3d 498 {Fla. 4th DCA 2015). S 838.014m. Fla. Stat.

*1293 “Pecuniary” means in the form of money. “Benefit” means gain or advantage or anything regarded by the person to be benefited as a gain or advantage, including the doing of an act beneficial to anv person in whose welfare he or she is interested, including anv commission, gift, gratuity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases
911 So. 2d 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Gary Czajkowski v. State of Florida
178 So. 3d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 So. 3d 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-casesreport-2016-10-fla-2017.