In Re Harris v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education
This text of 930 P.2d 873 (In Re Harris v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, Oregon State Board of Higher Education (the Board), appeals a circuit court judgment reversing the Board’s order that held that plaintiff did not meet the residency requirements that would qualify her for the tuition rates of an Oregon resident at the University of Oregon. We reverse.
The circuit court’s review was for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.484, and we review the circuit court’s decision to determine whether it properly applied its standard of review. United Citizens v. Oregon Environmental Quality Comm., 104 Or App 51, 799 P2d 665 (1990), rev den 311 Or 151 (1991).
On review, we agree with the Board that the trial court overstepped its permissible scope of review under ORS 183.484(4)(c) by substituting its judgment for that of the Board. The Board found that petitioner’s evidence failed to rebut the presumption that she was in Oregon primarily for educational purposes and the trial court reversed on the ground that it was not similarly persuaded. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings. The trial court’s contrary determination otherwise was error.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate Board’s order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
930 P.2d 873, 145 Or. App. 477, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harris-v-oregon-state-board-of-higher-education-orctapp-1996.