In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller

405 F.3d 17, 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1704, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6608
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 19, 2005·No. 19-1011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the brief of amici curiae in support of appellants have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing and the emergency motion for expedited consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the emergency motion for expedited consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc be dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, 405 F.3d 17, 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1704, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6608 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

405 F.3d 17 (In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sitzmann
74 F. Supp. 3d 128 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Wen Ho Lee v. Department of Justice
401 F. Supp. 2d 123 (District of Columbia, 2005)
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller
405 F.3d 17 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)