In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller

405 F.3d 17, 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1704, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6608
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2005
Docket19-1011
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 405 F.3d 17 (In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller, 405 F.3d 17, 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1704, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6608 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the brief of amici curiae in support of appellants have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing and the emergency motion for expedited consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the emergency motion for expedited consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc be dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sitzmann
74 F. Supp. 3d 128 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Wen Ho Lee v. Department of Justice
401 F. Supp. 2d 123 (District of Columbia, 2005)
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller
405 F.3d 17 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 F.3d 17, 365 U.S. App. D.C. 322, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1704, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grand-jury-subpoena-judith-miller-cadc-2005.