In re Gilmore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Gilmore

88 So. 3d 441, 2012 WL 1560175, 2012 La. LEXIS 1299

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Gilmore. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 La. LEXIS 1721 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 2, 2012·No. No. 2012-B-0852·Published

Opinion

ORDER

| Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Arthur Gilmore, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 1059, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

[442]*442FOR THE COURT:

/§/ John L. Weimer Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

| Considering the Petition for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that Arthur Gilmore, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 1059, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26(E), this order is effective immediately.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, §§ 11 and 19.

[442]*442FOR THE COURT:

/§/ John L. Weimer Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Gilmore, 88 So. 3d 441, 2012 WL 1560175, 2012 La. LEXIS 1299 (La. 2012).

Pincite

88 So. 3d 441 (In re Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.