In re Gilmore

72 So. 3d 342, 2011 La. LEXIS 2085, 2011 WL 4426244

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Gilmore. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 La. LEXIS 1721 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 21, 2011·No. No. 2011-B-1401·Published

Opinion

ORDER

| iConsidering the Motion to Dissolve Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED THAT pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19(D), this court’s order of July 19, 2011 interimly suspending respondent be and hereby is dissolved.

This order shall be effective immediately.

GUIDRY, J., would deny the Motion to Dissolve Interim Suspension.

/s/ Marcus R. Clark /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

| iConsidering the Motion to Dissolve Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED THAT pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19(D), this court’s order of July 19, 2011 interimly suspending respondent be and hereby is dissolved.

This order shall be effective immediately.

GUIDRY, J., would deny the Motion to Dissolve Interim Suspension.

/s/ Marcus R. Clark /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Gilmore, 72 So. 3d 342, 2011 La. LEXIS 2085, 2011 WL 4426244 (La. 2011).

Pincite

72 So. 3d 342 (In re Gilmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.