In Re General Growth Properties, Inc.

406 B.R. 171, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1186, 2009 WL 1615834
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMay 14, 2009
Docket14-36870
StatusPublished

This text of 406 B.R. 171 (In Re General Growth Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re General Growth Properties, Inc., 406 B.R. 171, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1186, 2009 WL 1615834 (N.Y. 2009).

Opinion

FINAL ORDER APPROVING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO (I) HONOR TENANT OBLIGATIONS AND (II) AUTHORIZE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO HONOR RELATED CHECKS AND TRANSFERS

ALAN L. GROPPER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon the motion, dated April 16, 2009 (the “Motion ”) 1 of South Street Seaport Limited Partnership, its ultimate parent, General Growth Properties, Inc. (“GGP ”), and their debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, “General Growth ” or the “Debtors ”) for the entry of interim and final orders, pursuant to sections 105, 363(b), and 503(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code ”), authorizing the Debtors to (i) honor Tenant Obligations and (ii) authorize financial institutions to honor related checks and transfers, all as more fully described in the Motion; and upon consideration of relief requested in the supplement to the Motion, dated April 29, 2009 (the “Supplement ”) regarding Amendments to Property Documents; and the Debtors having filed, on May 6, 2008, their Debtors’ Omnibus Reply to Objections to Debtors’ Motions for Approval of Debtor in Possession Financing, use of Cash Collateral and Cash Management System (the “Omnibus Reply ”); and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion, the Supplement and the Omnibus Reply and the relief requested therein in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Standing Order of Referral of Cases to Bankruptcy Judges of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 19, 1984 (Ward, Acting C.J.); and consideration of the Motion; the Supplement and the Omnibus Reply and the relief requested therein being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and due and proper notice of the Motion the Supplement and the Omnibus Reply having been provided to: (i) the Office of the United States Trustee for the Southern District of New York (Attn: Greg M. Zipes); (ii) proposed counsel to the official committee of unsecured creditors; (iii) the Securities and Exchange Commission; (iv) the Internal Revenue Service; (v) EuroH-ypo AG, New York Branch, administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under (a) the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 24, 2006 and (b) the Loan Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2008, as amended; (vi) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under certain Loan Agreements, dated as of January 2, 2008 and February 29, 2009, respectively; (vii) Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, as administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2008; (viii) Wilmington Trust, FSB, as indenture trustee under (a) that certain Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2006, and (b) that certain Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2007; (ix) La-Salle Bank National Association and Wil *172 mington Trust, FSB, 2 as indenture trustee under that certain Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of February 24, 2006; (x) The Bank of New York Melon Corporation, as indenture trustee under that certain Indenture, dated as of February 24, 1995; (xi) those creditors holding the 100 largest unsecured claims against the Debtors’ estates (on a consolidated basis); and (xii) parties entitled to receive notice in these chapter 11 cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002; and the Court having determined that the relief requested in the Motion and the Supplement are in the best interests of the Debtors, their creditors, and all parties in interest; and the Court having determined that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion, the Supplement and the Omnibus Reply establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had before the Court and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby

ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 105(a), 368(b), and 503(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, the relief requested in the Motion, as supplemented, is granted to the extent provided in this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the Debtors are authorized to continue their prepetition practices with respect to Tenant Obligations and Property Issues, including, but not limited to, (i) the negotiation and entry into postpetition Property Documents, which may provide for Tenant Improvements, and (ii) postpetition Amendments to pre- and postpetition Property Documents, including the satisfaction of any prepetition claims or obligations in connection therewith; and it is further

ORDERED that, except as limited by this Order, the Debtors are authorized, in their sole discretion, to satisfy all prepetition Tenant Obligations in the ordinary course of business through either: (i) a cash payment or (ii) renegotiated, modified, and/or amended lease terms providing for, among other things, a reduced rental rate; and it is further

ORDERED that, except with respect to Amendments in situations where conditions stipulated in a Property Document have given, or will give, the Tenant the right thereunder to early termination or rent reduction on a date certain, the Debtors shall provide written notice (“Notice ”) to counsel to the official committee of unsecured creditors (the “Committee ”), of the terms of each individual proposed pre-petition Tenant Obligation or Amendment that either:

• Satisfies a prepetition Tenant Obligation in excess of $500,000 through either: (i) a cash payment or (ii) renegotiated, modified, and/or amended lease terms providing for, among other things, a reduced rental rate;
• Provides a Tenant with a reduction of all payments due under the Property Document in excess of $200,000 on an annual basis (as reasonably determined by Debtors); or
• Terminates a Property Document where the Tenant agrees to pay Debtors a termination fee and that termination fee does not exceed the lesser of one year’s rent (excluding payments other than rent, such as common area *173 maintenance charges, taxes, etc.) or 50% of the rent (excluding payments other than rent, such as common area maintenance charges, taxes, etc.) due for the remaining term of the Property Document;

and it is further

ORDERED that the Notice to the Committee will be shared only among the Committee’s professionals while the Debtors’ and Committee’s professionals work to establish a sub-committee of Committee members who may receive this information (the “Sub-Committee ”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Procedures
28 U.S.C. § 157
§ 1334
28 U.S.C. § 1334
§ 1409
28 U.S.C. § 1409

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 B.R. 171, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1186, 2009 WL 1615834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-general-growth-properties-inc-nysb-2009.