In re General Growth Properties, Inc.

412 B.R. 609, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1199, 2009 WL 1615832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re General Growth Properties, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 409 B.R. 43
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 14, 2009·No. No. 09-11977 (ALG)·Published

Opinion

FINAL ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 105(a), 345(b), 363(b), 363(c) AND 364(a) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND BANKRUPTCY RULES 6003 AND 6004(A) AUTHORIZING THE DEBTORS TO (I) CONTINUE USING EXISTING CENTRALIZED CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (II) HONOR CERTAIN PREPETITION OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO THE USE OF THE CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND (III) MAINTAIN EXISTING BANK ACCOUNTS AND BUSINESS FORMS; (B) GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 345(b) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND (C) SCHEDULING A FINAL HEARING

ALLAN L. GROPPER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Upon the motion, dated April 16, 2009 (the “Motion ”)1 of South Street Seaport Limited Partnership, its parent, General Growth Properties, Inc. (“GGP ”), and their debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, “General Growth ” or the “Debtors ”), pursuant to sections 105(a), 345(b), 363(b), 363(c) and 364(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules 6003 and 6004, for (a) authority to (i) continue to operate the Cash Management System, (ii) honor certain prepetition obligations related to the use of the Cash Management System, (in) maintain existing business forms, and (iv) maintain existing Bank Accounts; (b) extend the time to comply with section 345(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and (c) to schedule a final hearing (the “Final Hearing ”); all as more fully described in the Motion; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and grant the requested relief in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Standing Order M-61 Referring to Bankruptcy Judges for the Southern District of New York Any and All Proceedings Under Title 11, dated July 10, [610]*6101984 (Ward, Acting C.J.); and consideration of the Motion being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and the Debtors having provided notice of the Motion and Hearing (as defined below) (i) the Office of the United States Trustee for the Southern District of New York (Attn: Greg M. Zipes); (ii) the Securities and Exchange Commission; (iii) the Internal Revenue Service; (iv) EuroHypo AG, New York Branch, administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under (a) the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 24, 2006 and (b) the Loan Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2008, as amended; (v) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under certain Loan Agreements, dated as of January 2, 2008 and February 29, 2008, respectively; (vi) Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, as administrative agent for the lenders to certain of the Debtors under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2008; (vii) Wilmington Trust, FSB, as indenture trustee under (a) that certain Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2006, and (b) that certain Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2007; (viii) LaSalle Bank National Association and Wilmington Trust, FSB,2 as indenture trustee under that certain Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of February 24, 2006; (ix) The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as indenture trustee under that certain Indenture, dated as of February 24, 1995; (x) those creditors holding the 100 largest unsecured claims against the Debtors’ estates (on a consolidated basis) and the (xi) the Banks (collectively, the “Notice Parties ”); and the Court having held a hearing to consider the requested final relief on May 8, and May 13, 2009 (the “Hearing ”); and upon the Declarations, the record of the Hearing, and all of the proceedings before the Court, the Court finds and determines that this Court has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Motion; the requested relief is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, creditors, and all parties in interest; the Debtors have provided due and proper notice of the Motion and Hearing and no further notice is necessary; the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion establish just and sufficient cause to grant the requested relief herein; the relief granted herein is necessary to avoid immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtors and their estates, as provided in Bankruptcy Rule 6003, and therefore it is:

ORDERED that the Motion is granted as provided herein; and it is further

ORDERED that the Debtors are authorized and empowered, pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, to continue to manage their cash pursuant to the Cash Management System maintained by the Debtors prior to the Commencement Date, subject to any changes that may be appropriate or required thereto in connection with an order approving the Debtors’ postpetition fínanc[611]*611ing, permitting use of cash collateral and granting adequate protection, and to collect, concentrate, and disburse cash in accordance with the Cash Management System, including intercompany transfers of funds (subject to such changes as to the Cash Management System as may be necessary, from time to time, to address the basic purposes of the Cash Management System); and it is further

ORDERED that the Debtors shall continue to maintain all receipts and disbursements and records of all transfers within the Cash Management System utilized postpetition so that all postpetition transfers and transactions will be properly documented, and accurate intercompany balances will be maintained; and it is further

ORDERED that all Intercompany Claims against a Debtor by another Debt- or or non-debtor affiliate arising after the Commencement Date as a result of inter-company transactions and transfers in the ordinary course of business shall be accorded administrative expense priority status in accordance with sections 503(b) and 507(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided, however that any such administrative expense claims shall rank junior in priority of payment to the superpriority administrative expense claims granted to any prospective postpetition lender to the Debtors on account of such postpetition financing; and it is further

ORDERED that the Debtors are authorized to: (i) designate, maintain and continue to use any or all of their existing Bank Accounts including those listed on Exhibit 1, hereof, in the names and with the account numbers existing immediately prior to the Commencement Date (which Exhibit 1 shall be promptly amended to identify any Bank Accounts inadvertently omitted therefrom and which Exhibit 1, as so amended, shall be served within two (2) business days therefrom on the U.S. Trustee and the statutory committee of creditors (if and when appointed)), (ii) deposit funds in and withdraw funds from such accounts by all usual means including, without limitation, checks, drafts, wire transfers, automated clearinghouse transfers {“ACH Transfers ”) and other debits, (iii) pay any bank fees or charges associated with the Bank Accounts, and (iv) treat their prepetition Bank Accounts for all purposes as debtors in possession accounts; and it is further

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re General Growth Properties, Inc., 412 B.R. 609, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 1199, 2009 WL 1615832 (N.Y. 2009).

412 B.R. 609 (In re General Growth Properties, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Procedures
28 U.S.C. § 157
§ 1334
28 U.S.C. § 1334
§ 1409
28 U.S.C. § 1409