In Re Former Judge Dalessandro

596 A.2d 798, 528 Pa. 240, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 13, 1991
DocketDocket 150
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 596 A.2d 798 (In Re Former Judge Dalessandro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Former Judge Dalessandro, 596 A.2d 798, 528 Pa. 240, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 196 (Pa. 1991).

Opinions

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This matter comes before the Court on the Petition of the Judicial Inquiry and Review Board to Implement Automatic Forfeiture of Judicial Office. The Board filed its petition on February 8, 1990, requesting that the Court issue a Rule to Show Cause why the Arthur D. Dalessandro should not be subject to the provisions of Article 5, Section 18(l) of the Pennsylvania Constitution and be declared automatically removed from his judicial office as of January 19, 1990, and thereafter be ineligible for judicial office. Although we did not issue the Rule requested by the Petition, on August 1, 1990, we entered an Order directing that the matter be listed for oral argument at the Pittsburgh session of Court commencing September 24, 1990.

On October 25, 1989, Dalessandro pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to two counts of attempted income tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. On October 24, 1989, the day before the entry of his guilty plea, Dalessandro resigned his position as judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County. On January 19, 1990, Dalessandro was sentenced to serve a term of one year in a federal prison and to pay fines totalling $30,000.00 plus costs.

Based on the analysis set out in In re: Joseph P. Braig, 527 Pa. 248, 590 A.2d 284 (1991), we hold that Dalessandro was not “convicted of misbehavior in office” so as to require automatic forfeiture of office pursuant to Article V, Section 18(l). Accordingly, the present Petition filed by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Board is dismissed.

[242]*242LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. NIX, C.J., files a concurring opinion. FLAHERTY and PAPADAKOS, JJ., file dissenting opinions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Gentile
654 A.2d 676 (Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania, 1994)
In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994)
Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania, 1994
In Re Former Judge Dalessandro
596 A.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 A.2d 798, 528 Pa. 240, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-former-judge-dalessandro-pa-1991.