In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994)

Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994)

CourtCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 11, 1994

DocketDocket No. 5 JD 94.

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994) (In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994), (cjdpa 1994).

Pincite

Opinions

The Court has been unable to garner a majority vote required by Article V, Section 18(b)(4) of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, in order to take action on the Petition to Implement Automatic Forfeiture of Judicial Office filed July 11, 1994, by the Judicial Conduct Board. Accordingly, the Petition is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice to the right of the Judicial Conduct Board to file formal charges, pursuant to Article V, Section 18 of the Constitution, against the respondent herein, Raymond L. Gentile, Jr., subject to the procedural rules of this Court and the Constitutional safeguards provided by Article V, Section 18(a) and (b).

Respondent's request for a stay of this matter, contained in Respondent's Answer to Petition filed July 26, 1994, is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court has been unable to garner a majority vote required by Article V, Section 18(b)(4) of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, in order to take action on the Petition to Implement Automatic Forfeiture of Judicial Office filed July 11, 1994, by the Judicial Conduct Board. Accordingly, the Petition is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice to the right of the Judicial Conduct Board to file formal charges, pursuant to Article V, Section 18 of the Constitution, against the respondent herein, Raymond L. Gentile, Jr., subject to the procedural rules of this Court and the Constitutional safeguards provided by Article V, Section 18(a) and (b).

Respondent's request for a stay of this matter, contained in Respondent's Answer to Petition filed July 26, 1994, is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re Gentile, 5 Jd 94 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 7-11-1994), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gentile-5-jd-94-pactjuddisc-7-11-1994-cjdpa-1994.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack