In Re Final Rules for Acceptance of Records on Appeal in Electronic Format and Elimination of the Abstracting and Addendum Requirements

2020 Ark. 421
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 17, 2020
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 2020 Ark. 421 (In Re Final Rules for Acceptance of Records on Appeal in Electronic Format and Elimination of the Abstracting and Addendum Requirements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Final Rules for Acceptance of Records on Appeal in Electronic Format and Elimination of the Abstracting and Addendum Requirements, 2020 Ark. 421 (Ark. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 421 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE FINAL RULES FOR Opinion Delivered December 17, 2020 ACCEPTANCE OF RECORDS ON APPEAL IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT AND ELIMINATION OF THE ABSTRACTING AND ADDENDUM REQUIREMENTS

PER CURIAM Today, we are pleased to announce the adoption of final rules concerning electronic

records and briefing in this court and the court of appeals. On June 6, 2019, we authorized

the electronic filing of all case-initiating documents, including electronic records on appeal.

In re Acceptance of Records on Appeal in Electronic Format and Elimination of the Abstracting and

Addendum Requirements, 2019 Ark. 213. At that time, we published for comment proposed

amendments to our court rules that incorporated the electronic filing of case-initiating

documents, that eliminated the abstract and addendum requirements for appellate briefs, and

that updated our briefing rules. Id. We also authorized parties to proceed under the proposed

amendments in cases with an electronic record as a pilot-project to test the feasibility of the

proposed amendments. Id. Because the pilot-project has been a success, we adopt the

proposed amendments as final with some minor additions and revisions, and we make the

electronic filing of appeal records mandatory for cases in which the notice of appeal was

filed on or after June 1, 2021. The final amendments1 are set out in full at the end of this order, as well as in “line-

in, line-out fashion (new material is underlined; deleted material is lined through). The

“line-in, line-out” inclusion is intended to make clear the changes we have made to the

proposed rules set forth in 2019 Ark. 213. These rule changes shall take effect immediately

and require, among other things, that appeal records and other case-initiating documents be

filed electronically. However, we recognize that there are cases in which the circuit clerks

and court reporters are likely in the process of preparing some appeal records in paper

format. Therefore, we authorize the clerk of this court to accept for filing conventional

paper appeal records when the notice of appeal is filed prior to June 1, 2021, but the briefs

in those cases must include an abstract and an addendum. For all cases in which the notice

of appeal is filed on or after June 1, 2021 (except for cases in which the appellant is

proceeding pro se),2 the record shall be filed in electronic format.

At this time, we also take the opportunity to highlight the importance of the new

“jurisdictional statement” and “statement of the case and the facts” sections that were

included in the proposed amendments and are adopted as final today. These new sections

replace the abstract and addendum requirements and are therefore crucial to appellate

1 This order amends the following Supreme Court Rules: 1-2, 1-4, 2-3, 3-1, 3-3, 3- 4, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-7, 6-1, 6-7, and 6-9. This order also amends Rule 7 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure-Civil, Rule 3 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure-Criminal, and Rule 6-9 Form 2 for use in dependency-neglect appeals. 2 For cases in which the appellant is proceeding pro se, circuit court staff shall continue to prepare the record on appeal in conventional paper form unless the appellant requests an electronic record. However, conventional paper records should, to the extent possible, be formatted and paginated according to the requirements for electronic appeal records.

2 briefing under the rules as amended. Id. at 3–4. The addendum provided the court with

information about all of the claims raised below, the disposition of those claims, and the

timeliness of the appeal so that we could confirm our appellate jurisdiction. This

jurisdictional information must now be contained in the new jurisdictional statement. Ark.

Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(5) (as amended by this order). And the statement of the case and the facts

section, like the abstract before it, must contain all “material” information that “is essential

to understand the case and to decide the issues on appeal.” Compare Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-

2(a)(5) (the former abstract rule) with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(6) (the new statement of the

case and the facts rule as amended by this order). Thus, appellate practitioners must be careful

to discuss important factual and procedural information in the new statement of the case

and the facts section so that the appellate courts can understand the evidence presented

below to decide the issues on appeal.3 The jurisdictional statement and the statement of the

case and the facts must also be supported by pinpoint citations to the electronic record in

the format required by Supreme Court Rule 4-2(f) as amended by this order.

These new rules still require the appellant to transmit the record on appeal from the

circuit court to the appellate courts. As noted in In re Acceptance of Records on Appeal in

Electronic Format and Elimination of the Abstracting and Addendum Requirements, 2019 Ark. 213,

we are exploring the possibility of an automated process that would allow the circuit clerks

to submit trial court records directly to the appellate clerk. We continue to explore that

3 And as with the abstract, any fact not referenced in the statement of the case and the facts cannot support the grant of rehearing. Compare Sup. Ct. R. 2-3(h) (prior version) with Sup. Ct. R. 2-3(h) (as amended by this order). 3 possibility. As technology improves, it is essential that we keep pace to ensure maximum

access to justice.

Lastly, we authorize the clerk of this court to promulgate and update policies and

procedures for the implementation of this order and for the use and operation of the

electronic-filing and document-management systems. See In re Acceptance of Records on Appeal

in Electronic Format, 2019 Ark. 213, at 6–7.

4 Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals of the State of Arkansas

Rule 1-2. Appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.

....

(c) Transfer and certification. The Supreme Court may transfer to the Court of Appeals any case appealed to the Supreme Court and may transfer to the Supreme Court any case appealed to the Court of Appeals. If the Court of Appeals seeks to transfer a case, the Court of Appeals shall find and certify that the case: (1) is excepted from its jurisdiction by Rule 1-2(a), or (2) otherwise involves an issue of significant public interest or a legal principle of major importance. The Supreme Court may accept for its docket cases so certified or may remand any of them to the Court of Appeals for decision. The Clerk of the Court shall notify the parties or their counsel of the transfer of any case.

(d) Petition for review. No appeal as of right shall lie from the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will exercise its discretion to review an appeal decided by the Court of Appeals only on application by a party to the appeal, upon certification of the Court of Appeals, or if the Supreme Court decides the case is one that should have originally been assigned to the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Staci Burns v. Keaton Dillinger
2024 Ark. App. 412 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
Clifford W. Christian and Karen D. Christian v. Swo Properties, Inc.
2024 Ark. App. 290 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
Randy Hyatt v. State of Arkansas
2023 Ark. App. 191 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)
Jimmy Dion Bardin v. Margaret Bardin
2023 Ark. App. 195 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2023)
Christopher Burns v. State of Arkansas
2022 Ark. App. 472 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2022)
Logan Morrison v. State of Arkansas
2022 Ark. App. 131 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2022)
Joseph Evan Bennion v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 297 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-final-rules-for-acceptance-of-records-on-appeal-in-electronic-format-ark-2020.