In re Estate of Rudy
39 A. 968, 185 Pa. 359, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 723
Opinion
We find no error in the decree from which this appeal was taken. The questions involved were fully considered and correctly disposed of by the court below; and for reasons given in its opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Estate of Rudy, 39 A. 968, 185 Pa. 359, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 723 (Pa. 1898).
39 A. 968 (In re Estate of Rudy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. Commissioner
4 T.C. 423 (U.S. Tax Court, 1944)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Rosser
64 F.2d 631 (Third Circuit, 1933)
Bucks's Estate
11 Pa. D. & C. 638 (Berks County Orphans' Court, 1928)
Price's Estate
124 A. 179 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Smoot v. Bibb
97 S.E. 355 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1918)
Bair's Estate
99 A. 471 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Reed's Estate
85 A. 138 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Scott's Estate
37 Pa. Super. 342 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Painter v. Painter
69 A. 323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Land Title & Trust Co. v. McCoach
127 F. 381 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1904)
Raleigh's Estate
55 A. 1119 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
Morris v. Knight
14 Pa. Super. 324 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Thran v. Herzog
12 Pa. Super. 551 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Estate of Langdon
4 Coffey 357 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1899)