Reed's Estate

85 A. 16, 236 Pa. 578
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 22, 1912
DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 160
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A. 16 (Reed's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reed's Estate, 85 A. 16, 236 Pa. 578 (Pa. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

It follows from what we have said in the appeal of [579]*579Charles M. Eeed to No. 161, January Term, 1912, in the same estate, 236 Pa. 572, that the right in Lloyd G. Eeed to $8,000 out of the income from the trust fund was a vested right in him. The right to receive arrearages due on this annuity was no less vested. This right passed upon the death of Lloyd G. to his personal representatives. Now that the income from the trust estate has proved sufficient to pay the arrearages in part, the fund so applicable must be distributed to them, rather than to the children of Lloyd G. to whom the annuity survives. There was no error in the court so ordering. The appeal is dismissed, and the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed's Estate
85 A. 15 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A. 16, 236 Pa. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reeds-estate-pa-1912.