In re Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Commissioner of Social Services

181 A.D.2d 631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 631 (In re Commissioner of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Commissioner of Social Services, 181 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Edward M. Kaufmann, J.), entered November [632]*63226, 1991, which denied respondent mother’s motion to add respondent father’s live-in paramour as a party respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court may not exercise jurisdiction over respondent father’s paramour, who accompanied him and the subject child during an unsupervised visitation on the day that cocaine was allegedly found in the child’s urine, since she was not a regular member of the child’s household and thus not a "person legally responsible” for the child’s care within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (g) (Matter of Faith GG., 179 AD2d 901). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Edward M. Kaufmann, J.), entered November [632]*63226, 1991, which denied respondent mother’s motion to add respondent father’s live-in paramour as a party respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court may not exercise jurisdiction over respondent father’s paramour, who accompanied him and the subject child during an unsupervised visitation on the day that cocaine was allegedly found in the child’s urine, since she was not a regular member of the child’s household and thus not a "person legally responsible” for the child’s care within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (g) (Matter of Faith GG., 179 AD2d 901). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-commissioner-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack