In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.

290 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4126, 2006 WL 1309583

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 12, 2006

Docket05-06-00611-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 290 S.W.3d 238 (In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P., 290 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4126, 2006 WL 1309583 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Relators assert the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a motion for new trial after a jury had found in relators’ favor in a medical negligence lawsuit. The trial judge granted the new trial solely “in the interests of justice and fairness”. The trial judge’s explanation for the granting of the new trial was sufficient. See In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 22 S.W.3d 462 (Tex.2000)(orig.proceeding) and In re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG, 8 S.W.3d 326 (Tex.2000) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Relators assert the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a motion for new trial after a jury had found in relators’ favor in a medical negligence lawsuit. The trial judge granted the new trial solely “in the interests of justice and fairness”. The trial judge’s explanation for the granting of the new trial was sufficient. See In re Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 22 S.W.3d 462 (Tex.2000)(orig.proceeding) and In re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG, 8 S.W.3d 326 (Tex.2000) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4126, 2006 WL 1309583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-columbia-medical-center-of-las-colinas-subsidiary-lp-texapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack