In re C.L.C.
628 S.E.2d 760, 360 N.C. 475, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37
Opinion
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re C.L.C., 628 S.E.2d 760, 360 N.C. 475, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 37 (N.C. 2006).
628 S.E.2d 760 (In re C.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re L.C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2025
In re: L.C.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2024
In re A.E., J.V., E.V., and A.V.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
In re A.E.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
In re A.C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2021
In re Z.L.W.
831 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019)
In re T.N.H.
831 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2019)
In re: T.H. & M.H.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
In re A.J.K.
824 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
In re C.L.C.
808 S.E.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Catawba County ex rel. Rackley v. Loggins
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2017
In re A.G.
798 S.E.2d 442 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
Easley v. TLC Cos.
776 S.E.2d 898 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015)
Andrews v. Parrish
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re A.A.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re H.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re P.V.M.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
In re T.J.F.
750 S.E.2d 568 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
In re M.M.
750 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
In re D.S.
694 S.E.2d 758 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)