Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/In Re Budzyn

In Re Budzyn

206 S.W.3d 721, 2006 WL 2640528
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 26, 2006
Docket01-06-00012-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 206 S.W.3d 721 (In Re Budzyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Budzyn, 206 S.W.3d 721, 2006 WL 2640528 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinions

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Relator Teresa Budzyn seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s November 3, 2005 order disqualifying her counsel, Kimberly Soard, for breach of confidentiality and conflict of interest. We denied Bud-zyn’s petition for writ of mandamus on May 25, 2006.1 Budzyn has filed a motion for rehearing.

We deny the motion for rehearing. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8.

Justice KEYES concurring in the denial of rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.
358 S.W.3d 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Robert Earl Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., NDUSA Holdings Corp., and Bruce Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Brian Charles Smith Robert Hammond, David Talton And John Collins, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Greg Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas Cathleen Parsley, in Her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge, State Office of Administrative Hearings And Alicia Key, in Her Official Capacity
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007
In Re Budzyn
206 S.W.3d 721 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 S.W.3d 721, 2006 WL 2640528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-budzyn-texapp-2006.