Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/In Re Budzyn

In Re Budzyn

206 S.W.3d 721, 2006 WL 2640528
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 2006·No. 01-06-00012-CV·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Relator Teresa Budzyn seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s November 3, 2005 order disqualifying her counsel, Kimberly Soard, for breach of confidentiality and conflict of interest. We denied Bud-zyn’s petition for writ of mandamus on May 25, 2006.1 Budzyn has filed a motion for rehearing.

We deny the motion for rehearing. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8.

Justice KEYES concurring in the denial of rehearing.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Budzyn, 206 S.W.3d 721, 2006 WL 2640528 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

206 S.W.3d 721 (In Re Budzyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.
358 S.W.3d 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Robert Earl Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., NDUSA Holdings Corp., and Bruce Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Brian Charles Smith Robert Hammond, David Talton And John Collins, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Greg Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas Cathleen Parsley, in Her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge, State Office of Administrative Hearings And Alicia Key, in Her Official Capacity
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007
In Re Budzyn
206 S.W.3d 721 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)