Home/Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation/In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

734 F. Supp. 2d 1380
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation·Decided August 10, 2010·No. MDL Nos. 2189, 2185·Published

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: All parties in the actions listed on Schedule A are hereby ordered to show cause why those actions should not be transferred to the Southern District of Texas for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in MDL No. 2185, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Any party may submit a response to this order no later than August 27, 2010. Any replies to those responses are due no later than September 3, 2010.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 2189 — IN RE: BP SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND EMPLOYMENT RETIREMENT INCOME SEC. ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION

MDL No. 2185 — IN RE: BP p.I.c. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Northern District of Illinois Charis Moule v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:10-3990

Syed Arshadullah, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:10-4026

Southern District of New York Ralph Whitley v. BP, PLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:10-935

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation, 734 F. Supp. 2d 1380 (jpml 2010).

734 F. Supp. 2d 1380 (In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Multidistrict litigation
28 U.S.C. § 1407