In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation

734 F. Supp. 2d 1380

CourtUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

DecidedAugust 10, 2010

DocketMDL Nos. 2189, 2185

StatusPublished

This text of 734 F. Supp. 2d 1380 (In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation, 734 F. Supp. 2d 1380 (jpml 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: All parties in the actions listed on Schedule A are hereby ordered to show cause why those actions should not be transferred to the Southern District of Texas for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in MDL No. 2185, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Any party may submit a response to this order no later than August 27, 2010. Any replies to those responses are due no later than September 3, 2010.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 2189 — IN RE: BP SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND EMPLOYMENT RETIREMENT INCOME SEC. ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION

MDL No. 2185 — IN RE: BP p.I.c. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Northern District of Illinois Charis Moule v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:10-3990

Syed Arshadullah, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:10-4026

Southern District of New York Ralph Whitley v. BP, PLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:10-935

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI