In re Baluss

Michigan Supreme Court

In re Baluss

28 Mich. 507, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 20

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 13, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 28 Mich. 507 (In re Baluss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baluss, 28 Mich. 507, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 20 (Mich. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooley, J.

This was a proceeding which sought to have the name .of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys for professional misbehavior. While not strictly a criminal prosecution, it is of that nature, and the punishment, in prohibiting the party following his ordinary occupation, would he severe and highly penal. The majority of the court are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases, and the application will therefore be denied.

Graves, Ch. J., and Campbell, J., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooley, J.

This was a proceeding which sought to have the name .of respondent stricken from the roll of attorneys for professional misbehavior. While not strictly a criminal prosecution, it is of that nature, and the punishment, in prohibiting the party following his ordinary occupation, would he severe and highly penal. The majority of the court are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases, and the application will therefore be denied.

Graves, Ch. J., and Campbell, J., concurred. Christiancy, J., did not sit in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Mich. 507, 1874 Mich. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baluss-mich-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack