In re Clink
117 Mich. 619
Opinion
While this proceeding has been held not to be strictly a criminal prosecution, still the punishment is severe and highly penal. The charges ought to be clearly sustained. To quote the language of this court in a similar proceeding, we “are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases.” In re Baluss, 28 Mich. 507.
An order will therefore be entered denying the application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Clink, 117 Mich. 619 (Mich. 1898).
117 Mich. 619 (In re Clink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Posler
213 N.W.2d 133 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1973)
State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Jackson
211 N.W.2d 38 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1973)
State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Freid
202 N.W.2d 692 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1972)
State Bar of Michigan v. Woll
194 N.W.2d 835 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1972)
In re Coburn & Glocheski
174 N.W. 134 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1919)