In re Clink

Michigan Supreme Court

In re Clink

117 Mich. 619

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 117 Mich. 619 (In re Clink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Clink, 117 Mich. 619 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While this proceeding has been held not to be strictly a criminal prosecution, still the punishment is severe and highly penal. The charges ought to be clearly sustained. To quote the language of this court in a similar proceeding, we “are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases.” In re Baluss, 28 Mich. 507.

An order will therefore be entered denying the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While this proceeding has been held not to be strictly a criminal prosecution, still the punishment is severe and highly penal. The charges ought to be clearly sustained. To quote the language of this court in a similar proceeding, we “are not satisfied that the evidence gives such clear support to the charges as should be required in such cases.” In re Baluss, 28 Mich. 507.

An order will therefore be entered denying the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 Mich. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clink-mich-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack