in Re Avery Lamarr Ayers
This text of 515 S.W.3d 356 (in Re Avery Lamarr Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
On April 5, 2016, relator Avery Lamarr Ayers filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52. In the petition, relator, who was convicted for forgery of a financial instrument, claims he is innocent and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
Relator is requesting habeas corpus relief. The courts of appeals have no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex Parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (West 2015); Ex Parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding). Therefore, this court is without ju *357 risdiction to consider relator’s petition requesting habeas corpus relief.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 S.W.3d 356, 2016 WL 1533747, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-avery-lamarr-ayers-texapp-2016.