In Re John Gilbert Centeno Jr. v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 20, 2023
Docket04-23-00811-CR
StatusPublished

This text of In Re John Gilbert Centeno Jr. v. the State of Texas (In Re John Gilbert Centeno Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re John Gilbert Centeno Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00811-CR

IN RE JOHN GILBERT CENTENO JR., RELATOR

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 20, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On August 25, 2023, Relator John Gilbert Centeno Jr. filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus challenging his arrest and pre-trial commitment as unlawful. This court has no original

habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters; our original jurisdiction to entertain

applications for writ of habeas corpus extends solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d). Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate

only. In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding)

(per curiam); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.).

Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CR-11020, styled State v. John Gilbert Centeno, Jr., pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andrew Carruthers presiding. 04-23-00811-CR

Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05; see also In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d at 356.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodson v. State
988 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
in Re Avery Lamarr Ayers
515 S.W.3d 356 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re John Gilbert Centeno Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-gilbert-centeno-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.