in Re Adrian D. Curry
This text of in Re Adrian D. Curry (in Re Adrian D. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitions for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed January 10, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00870-CR NO. 14-22-00871-CR
IN RE ADRIAN D. CURRY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS WRITS OF MANDAMUS 208th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1779895 & 179896
MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION
As this court does in criminal appeals, I would give relator notice of the court’s intent to involuntarily dismiss these petitions for want of jurisdiction and allow relator an opportunity to respond.
Seeing no substantive difference in providing due process and due course of law in appeals and providing those constitutional rights in original proceedings, I respectfully dissent to the court’s failure to give notice and an opportunity to respond.
/s/ Charles A. Spain Justice
Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan (Spain, J., dissenting). Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Adrian D. Curry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adrian-d-curry-texapp-2023.