Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

92 A.D.3d 1204, 938 N.Y.S.2d 823
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 A.D.3d 1447 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 2012·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mercure, A.EJ, Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 92 A.D.3d 1204, 938 N.Y.S.2d 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

92 A.D.3d 1204 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.