Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

69 A.D.3d 1297, 892 N.Y.2d 807
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.3d 1297 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 69 A.D.3d 1297, 892 N.Y.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[1298]*1298Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 468
New York JUD § 468

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 1297, 892 N.Y.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-nyappdiv-2010.