In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

92 A.D.3d 1205, 938 N.Y.2d 824

This text of 92 A.D.3d 1205 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 92 A.D.3d 1205, 938 N.Y.2d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

. Mercure, A.EJ., Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 1205, 938 N.Y.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-nyappdiv-2012.