Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

90 A.D.3d 1228, 933 N.Y.2d 908
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 A.D.3d 1447 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 2011·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the "Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

[1229]*1229Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Mercare, A.RJ., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 90 A.D.3d 1228, 933 N.Y.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 1228 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 468
New York JUD § 468