In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

11 A.D.3d 375, 784 N.Y.S.2d 851, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631

Opinion

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 240 AD2d 106 (1998).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 11 A.D.3d 375, 784 N.Y.S.2d 851, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 375 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)