In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
11 A.D.3d 345, 786 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12450
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 631 →
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 257 AD2d 127 (1999).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 11 A.D.3d 345, 786 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
11 A.D.3d 345 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)