In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
275 A.D.2d 663, 716 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10223
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 2000·Published
Opinion
—Motion granted to the extent of reinstating respondent as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See, 230 AD2d 366.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 275 A.D.2d 663, 716 N.Y.S.2d 556, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
275 A.D.2d 663 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)