In re Anderson

Ninth Circuit

In re Anderson

117 F.2d 939, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4378

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 117 F.2d 939 (In re Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Anderson, 117 F.2d 939, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4378 (9th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis in this court is denied because without merit for two reasons: One, our power as a court to issue such writs is in aid of our appellate jurisdiction only. De Maurez v. Swope, 100 F.2d 530; Ferguson v. Swope, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 152; De Maurez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 564. Two, the lower federal courts should not consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus where the petitioner is detained under state process save in exceptional cases. Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179, 27 S.Ct. 459, 51 L.Ed. 760; Ex parte Melendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d.791; Ex parte Penney, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 27; Ex parte Jefferson, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 471.

This is not such a case.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Application for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis in this court is denied because without merit for two reasons: One, our power as a court to issue such writs is in aid of our appellate jurisdiction only. De Maurez v. Swope, 100 F.2d 530; Ferguson v. Swope, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 152; De Maurez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 564. Two, the lower federal courts should not consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus where the petitioner is detained under state process save in exceptional cases. Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179, 27 S.Ct. 459, 51 L.Ed. 760; Ex parte Melendez, 9 Cir., 98 F.2d.791; Ex parte Penney, 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 27; Ex parte Jefferson, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 471.

This is not such a case.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 F.2d 939, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anderson-ca9-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack