De Maurez v. Swope

100 F.2d 530, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2699
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 23, 1938·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the above entitled matter a petition for writ of habeas corpus addressed to this court is offered for filing, together with an affidavit praying that petitioner be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. The affidavit does not show that the petitioner is a citizen of the United States; consequently, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis (28 U.S.C.A. § 832). This court, as such, has no power to issue writs of habeas corpus except when necessary for the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction (28 U.S.C.A. § 377; 28 U.S.C.A. § 452, as amended February 13, 1925, 43 Stats. 940; 28 U.S.C.A. § 463(a). This is not such a case.

The clerk is directed to return -to the petitioner the petition tendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Maurez v. Swope, 100 F.2d 530, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2699 (9th Cir. 1938).

100 F.2d 530 (De Maurez v. Swope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blue v. Hiatt
55 F. Supp. 107 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1944)
Posey v. Dowd
134 F.2d 613 (Seventh Circuit, 1943)
De Maurez v. Squier
134 F.2d 325 (Ninth Circuit, 1943)
Hawk v. Olson
130 F.2d 910 (Eighth Circuit, 1942)
Smith v. United States
124 F.2d 517 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Austin v. United States
40 F. Supp. 777 (E.D. Illinois, 1941)
Sweetney v. Johnston
121 F.2d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
In re Anderson
117 F.2d 939 (Ninth Circuit, 1941)
Maurez v. Swope
110 F.2d 564 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Smith v. Johnston
109 F.2d 152 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Ex parte Jefferson
106 F.2d 471 (Ninth Circuit, 1939)