Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In Re Ames

In Re Ames

98 N.E.2d 2, 155 Ohio St. 184, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 184, 44 Ohio Op. 161, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 554
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1951
Docket32128
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 98 N.E.2d 2 (In Re Ames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Ames, 98 N.E.2d 2, 155 Ohio St. 184, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 184, 44 Ohio Op. 161, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 554 (Ohio 1951).

Opinion

*185 Per Curiam.

The remedy for review of errors or irregularities in the conduct of a criminal trial or sentence after, conviction is by appeal and not by habeas corpus, where the committing court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person. Ex parte Van Hagan. 25 Ohio St., 426; In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Middleton, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Stewart and Taft, JJ., concur in the judgment for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in In re Levenson, 154 Ohio St., 278.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bednarik v. State of Ohio
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
Ellis v. State
158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
In re Stewart
156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.E.2d 2, 155 Ohio St. 184, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 184, 44 Ohio Op. 161, 1951 Ohio LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ames-ohio-1951.