Ellis v. State

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 1953·No. No. 33232·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651; In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St., 171, 98 [490]*490N. E. (2d), 11 In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Stewart, 156 Ohio St., 521, 103 N. E. (2d), 551.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ellis v. State, 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489 (Ohio 1953).

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489 (Ellis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Ames
98 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1951)
In Re Burson
89 N.E.2d 651 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1949)
In Re Whitmore
29 N.E.2d 363 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)