Ellis v. State
This text of 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489 (Ellis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651; In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St., 171, 98 [490]*490N. E. (2d), 11 In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Stewart, 156 Ohio St., 521, 103 N. E. (2d), 551.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-state-ohio-1953.