Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Bednarik v. State of Ohio

Bednarik v. State of Ohio

159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 3, 1953
DocketNo. 33378
StatusPublished

This text of 159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596 (Bednarik v. State of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bednarik v. State of Ohio, 159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596 (Ohio 1953).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The remedy for the review of alleged errors in the preliminary hearing and in the trial of one indicted for crime is by appeal and not by habeas corpus, where the committing court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person. In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Levenson, 154 Ohio St., 278, 95 N. E. (2d), 760.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur. . Taut, J., concurs in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Ames
98 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1951)
In Re Levenson
95 N.E.2d 760 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bednarik-v-state-of-ohio-ohio-1953.