In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.200

164 So. 3d 668, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 262, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 2236702
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2015
DocketSC15-765
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 164 So. 3d 668 (In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.200) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.200, 164 So. 3d 668, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 262, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 2236702 (Fla. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court, on its own motion, amends Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200 (The Record), effective October 1, 2015, to implement mandatory statewide electronic records on appeal. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(d). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

BACKGROUND

In 2012, this Court amended rule 9.200 to address the electronic transmission of the record on appeal. See In re Amends, to Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro., Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., Fla. Probate Rules, Fla. Small Claims Rules, Fla. Rules of Juv. Proc., Fla. Rules of App. Pro., & Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro. — Electronic Filing, 102 So.3d 451, *669 452 (Fla.2012). Although the clerks of court were not required to electronically transmit the record on appeal at that time, consistent with the then existing interim policy on the transmission of electronic records, 1 the Court encouraged the clerks, when possible, to electronically transmit the record on appeal under the new rules and requirements. Id. at 462; see also In re Electronic Records on Appeal, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC14-28 (May 7, 2014) (AOSC14-28) (further extending the date for requiring clerks of court to transmit an electronic record on appeal to June 30, 2015, and giving each appellate court continued authorization to require an electronic record on appeal as provided in the administrative order). At the same time the Court amended rule 9.200 to address the electronic transmission of the record on appeal, the Court adopted procedures for the rollout of mandatory electronic filing of all documents filed in Florida’s courts. See Electronic Filing, 102 So.3d at 451. The implementation of mandatory electronic filing and providing for the transmission of an electronic record on appeal were significant strides toward the Court’s goal of creating a “fully electronic court system.” Id. at 452.

Since 2012, three district courts of appeal have exercised their option, as authorized in AOSC14-28 at 2, to require electronic records on appeal and have issued administrative orders specifying the content and attributes for electronic records on appeal filed in those courts. See In re: Electronic Filing of Appellate Records, Fla. 3d DCA Admin. Order No. AO3D13-04 (May 28, 2013); In re: Electronic Filing of Appellate Records, Fla. 4th DCA Admin. Order No. AO02013-03 (April 19, 2013); see, e.g., In re Electronic Filing of Appellate Records from Citrus and St. Johns Counties, Fla. 5th DCA Admin. Order No. AO5D12-01 (July 1, 2012). Those administrative orders have resulted in the efficient production of user-friendly electronic records on appeal.

Inspired by the success in those district courts and in recognition of the fact that electronic filing is now the norm in Florida courts, this Court further amends rule 9.200 to provide statewide, uniform requirements and attributes for electronic records on appeal. Like .mandatory electronic filing, the implementation of mandatory electronic records on appeal is one of “the necessary steps in our ongoing efforts to provide the public with electronic access to noneonfidential court records.” See Electronic Filing, 102 So.3d at 452.

AMENDMENTS

The following are the more significant amendments the Court makes to rule 9.200 in order to effectuate the goal of statewide electronic records on appeal.

Because the amended rule requires the clerk of the lower tribunal to electronically transmit to the appellate court only PDF files of the record and trial transcript, the requirement in subdivision (a)(2) — that the lower tribunal retain the original of certain documents in certain case types — and the requirements in subdivisions (b)(2) and (d)(1)(B) — that the record and the trial transcript each be divided into consecutively numbered volumes of no more than 200 pages per volume — are deleted. Under the revised rule, all original filings will remain in the lower tribunals, rendering subdivision (a)(2) redundant.

Next, subdivision (b) (Transcript(s) of Proceedings) is amended to require that *670 the consecutively numbered trial transcript be filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal separately from the transcript(s) of any other designated proceedings.

Amended subdivision (d) (Duties of Clerk; Preparation and Transmittal of Electronic Record), outlines the clerk’s responsibilities in preparing the record on appeal and electronically transmitting the record and trial transcript to the appellate court. As amended, subdivision (d) sets out the requirements for and attributes of the electronically transmitted record. Consistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(g)(8), the index to the record prepared by the clerk must indicate any confidential information in the record and if the information was determined to be confidential in an order, identify the order. The transcript of the trial must be kept separate from the remainder of the record on appeal. All pages of the remainder of the record, including the cover page, index, and progress docket, must be consecutively numbered. The entire record, except for the trial transcript, must be compiled into a single text searchable PDF file that must be bookmarked as provided in the rule and paginated to exactly match the pagination of the index of the record on appeal. All filings must be included in the PDF file in their unredacted form. The transcript of the trial must be converted into a second text searchable PDF file that must be paginated to exactly match the pagination of the index of the transcript of the trial filed under subdivision (b)(2) of rule 9.200.

Amended subdivision (d) also provides that the clerk must transmit the PDF files containing the record and trial transcript to the appellate court via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal or in accordance with the appellate court’s administrative order governing transmission of the record. This amendment allows an appellate court to specify, by administrative order, alternate methods of transmission of the record to that court in addition to transmission via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal.

Finally, it is significant that the amendments to rule 9.200 do not impact the status of confidential information in a record on appeal or the public’s access to any record on appeal. Access to electronic court records, including the record on appeal, continues to be governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security Matrix adopted by the Court in In re: Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC14-19 (May 23, 2014). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420(a).

Accordingly, we amend Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200 as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective October 1, 2015, at 12:01 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 794 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.200
177 So. 3d 1254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 668, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 262, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1054, 2015 WL 2236702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-rule-of-appellate-procedure-9200-fla-2015.