In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

102 So. 3d 451, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2063, 2012 WL 4936363
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2012
DocketNo. SC11-399
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 102 So. 3d 451 (In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 102 So. 3d 451, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2063, 2012 WL 4936363 (Fla. 2012).

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

Consistent with the orders entered in this case on August 14, 2012, and October 9, 2012, the opinion dated June 21, 2012, is withdrawn and this revised opinion is substituted in its place.

In this case, the Court adopts proposed amendments to the Florida rules of court to implement mandatory electronic filing procedures for all documents filed in Flori[452]*452da’s courts.1 The proposed amendments represent a significant and important step toward our goal of a fully electronic court system by transitioning from permissive to mandatory electronic filing (e-filing). Also in furtherance of this goal, in a separate, related case we adopt amendments to the rules of court to require e-mail service of pleadings and documents between parties, and we have coordinated the dates on which those rules will become effective so that e-mail service will serve as a first step in preparing practitioners to function in an electronic environment. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro., Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., Fla. Probate Rules, Fla. Rules of Traffic Court, Fla. Small Claims Rules, Fla. Rules of Juv. Pro., Fla. Rules of App. Pro., and Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro.—E-mail Service Rule, No. SC10-2101 (Fla.2012) (In re E-mail Service Rule ).2 Mandatory electronic filing is also another of the necessary steps in our ongoing efforts to provide the public with electronic access to noneonfidential court records.3

The new rules and amendments to the existing rules at issue in this case will require attorneys to file documents with the trial and appellate courts by electronic transmission and will operate in tandem with the new mandatory e-mail service requirements for pleadings and documents. The proposed amendments will also require the clerks’ offices to maintain electronic court records, to convert paper documents to electronic documents, and to electronically transmit the record on appeal.

Because we recognize that the mandatory electronic filing requirements the Court adopts require that each clerk have the capacity to accept and maintain the documents electronically and will change the way that attorneys file documents, the Court has adopted an implementation schedule to phase in these requirements in each division of the trial courts and in the appellate courts based on input from all affected groups.4 The Court also recog[453]*453nizes that while those attorneys practicing in the civil divisions of the trial courts and in the appellate courts would like implementation to begin immediately, those attorneys who work for the public defenders, state attorneys, and regional counsel are operating under decreasing budgets so that while e-fíling and e-mail service will increase efficiency in the long run, resources to upgrade technology and train personnel are largely unavailable.

We take this opportunity, however, to encourage attorneys and clerks throughout Florida to take notice of the new electronic filing requirements that we adopt here and to begin the process of updating their current practices to conform to these requirements. In this regard, The Florida Bar, in coordination with the Florida Association of Court Clerks and Comptrollers (FACC), should undertake comprehensive educational outreach so that litigants and clerks are fully informed of the requirements and the substantial benefits of mandatory e-filing. As the Legislature has indicated, implementation of an electronic filing process should reduce costs, increase timeliness in the processing of cases, and provide the judiciary with case-related information to allow for improved case management. See § 28.22205, Fla. Stat. (2011).

Also, as explained in this opinion, in adopting the mandatory e-filing rules, the Court has exempted self-represented parties and self-represented nonparties, including nonparty governmental or public agencies. However, we strongly encourage these individuals and entities to take advantage of the e-filing procedures, which should produce cost savings and efficiency for all those involved with the justice system by eliminating mailing and copying costs.

BACKGROUND

History of Electronic Transmission of Court Records in Florida Courts

The judicial branch of Florida has long embraced the use of technology to increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and accessibility of the courts.5 We first adopted rules authorizing an early form of electronic transmission for documents filed with the courts more than three decades ago, in 1979. See In re Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., 872 So.2d 449, 463 (Fla.1979) (adopting Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.090 (Electronic Filing of Matters in all Proceedings Within the State Courts System), providing that any document may be filed with the court by an “electronic copying device”) (later renumbered Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.525).6 Since that time, we have continued to amend and revise these rules to accommodate new technology. See, e.g., Amends. to Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.090— Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents, 681 So.2d 698 (Fla.1996); Amends, to Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.090—Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents, and Rule 2.060—Attorneys, 701 So.2d 1164 (Fla.1997). In our 1996 opinion amending the electronic filing rule, we observed that the judicial branch was rapidly moving into the information age, and that amendments to the rules of court were necessary to establish “a proper and efficient process for the filing and mainte[454]*454nance of court records” in this new age. Amends, to Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.090—Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents, 681 So.2d at 699. We noted there:

As the head of the judicial branch, this Court has the exclusive responsibility for determining how records in the court system are filed and maintained. In carrying out that responsibility, we must ensure that the processes for the filing and maintenance of judicial records by electronic means are compatible, accessible, and cost efficient.

Id. (citations omitted).

Currently, Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.525 (Electronic Filing) is permissive and provides that all documents that are court records may be filed with the clerk by electronic transmission provided that the clerk has the ability to accept and retain electronic documents, the clerk or the chief judge of the circuit has requested permission to accept documents filed by electronic transmission, and this Court has entered an order allowing the clerk to accept documents electronically.7 See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.525(e)(1). Under these procedures, a number of trial courts have adopted plans for electronic filing in some or all divisions, and this Court has approved such plans. See, e.g., In re Electronic Transmission and Filing of Documents Under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.090 for Manatee County, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSCO1-4 (Jan. 26, 2001); In re Electronic Transmission and Filing of Documents Under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.090 for Orange County, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC05-2 (Feb. 2, 2005); In re Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents Under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.525 for Broward County, Fla. Admin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 So. 3d 451, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2063, 2012 WL 4936363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-fla-2012.