In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1

2007 OK 1, 174 P.3d 566, 5 Ohio St. 2001, 2007 WL 1112571
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 25, 2007
DocketSCBD 5253, SCAD 2007-1
StatusPublished
Cited by119 cases

This text of 2007 OK 1 (In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1, 2007 OK 1, 174 P.3d 566, 5 Ohio St. 2001, 2007 WL 1112571 (Okla. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

Rule 7.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, currently provides in pertinent part:

A lawyer who has been convicted in any Jurisdiction of a crime which demonstrates such lawyer's unfitness to practice law, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere or from a verdict after trial, shall be subject to discipline as herein provided, regardless of the pendency of an appeal.

To correct an oversight in the disciplinary system, Rule 7.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, is hereby amended to provide in pertinent part:

A lawyer who has been convicted or has tendered a plea of guilty or nolo conten-dere pursuant to a deferred sentence plea agreement in any jurisdiction of a crime which demonstrates such lawyer's unfitness to practice law, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or from a verdict after trial, shall be subject to discipline as herein provided, regardless of the pendency of an appeal. (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 7.2, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A currently provides:

The clerk of any court within this State in which a lawyer is convicted shall transmit certified copies of the indictment or information and judgment and sentence of conviction to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and to the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association within (5) days *567 after said conviction. The documents may also be furnished to the Chief Justice by the General Counsel. Such documents, whether from this jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules.

Rule 7.2, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A is hereby amended to provide:

The clerk of any court within this State in which a lawyer is convicted or as to whom proceedings are deferred shall transmit certified copies of the Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and judgment and sentence of conviction to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and to the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association within (5) days after said conviction. The documents may also be furnished to the Chief Justice by the General Counsel. Such documents, whether from this jurisdiction or any other jurisdiction shall constitute the charge and be conclusive evidence of the commission of the crime upon which the judgment and sentence is based and shall suffice as the basis for discipline in accordance with these rules. (Emphasis supplied.)

Rule 7.3 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, currently provides in pertinent part:

Upon receipt of the certified copies of such indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court shall by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court. In its order of suspension the Court shall direct the lawyer to appear at a time certain, to show cause, if any he has, why the order of suspension should be set aside. Upon good cause shown, the Court may set aside its order of suspension when it appears to be in the interest of justice to do so, due regard being had to maintaining the integrity of and confidence in the profession.

Rule 7.3, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A is hereby amended to provide:

Upon receipt of the certified copies of Judgment and Sentence on a plea of guilty, order deferring judgment and sentence, indictment or information and the judgment and sentence, the Supreme Court shall by order immediately suspend the lawyer from the practice of law until further order of the Court. In its order of © suspension the Court shall direct the lawyer to appear at a time certain, to show cause, if any he has, why the order of suspension should be set aside. Upon good ecause shown, the Court may set aside its order of suspension when it appears to be in the interest of justice to do so, due regard being had to maintaining the integrity of and confidence in the profession. (Emphasis supplied.)

/s/ JAMES R. WINCHESTER CHIEF JUSTICE

WINCHESTER, C.J., EDMONDSON, V.C.J., HARGRAVE, OPALA, KAUGER, TAYLOR JJ., concur. LAVENDER, COLBERT, JJ., concur in part, dissent in part. WATT, J, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

THE B&F CORPORATION v. CAVERS
2022 OK CIV APP 35 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2022)
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GREEN
2020 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2020)
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WITHERS
2019 OK 47 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2019)
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GAINES
2018 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2018)
IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF HOPLIGHT
2018 OK 76 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2018)
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTON
2014 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2014)
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CHEADLE
2014 OK 7 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2014)
In re the Reinstatement of Sanger
2012 OK 91 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Conrady
2012 OK 29 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Noland
2011 OK 47 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2011)
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Martin
2010 OK 66 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2010)
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Willis
2009 OK 96 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
Fletcher v. Monroe
2009 OK 10 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
In Re Reinstatement of Pacenza
2009 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Golden
2008 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Shanbour
2008 OK 62 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2008)
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Blake
2008 OK 58 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2007 OK 1, 174 P.3d 566, 5 Ohio St. 2001, 2007 WL 1112571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendment-to-the-rules-governing-disciplinary-proceedings-rule-7-5-okla-2007.