In re A.G.

195 S.W.3d 886, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6564
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 26, 2006
DocketNo. 10-06-00107-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 195 S.W.3d 886 (In re A.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re A.G., 195 S.W.3d 886, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6564 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ABATEMENT ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A.G.’s retained appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. Because it is unclear at this juncture whether A.G. and his parent are presently indigent, we will abate this appeal pending a hearing in the trial court to determine whether A.G. is indigent. We will withhold a ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw until this issue has been resolved.

Counsel’s motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and appears to be meritorious. See Tex.R.App. P. 6.5. In addition, counsel served a copy of the motion on A.G.’s parent.1 See In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex.1998) (orig. proceeding) (when counsel files motion to withdraw with An-ders brief in juvenile delinquency appeal, the motion and brief should be “furnished to the juvenile client and the juvenile’s parent or guardian”); In re M.A.D., 167 S.W.3d 938, 939 n. 2 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005, order) (per curiam) (same). However, the [887]*887granting of counsel’s motion would leave A.G. without representation.

A juvenile has a statutory right to counsel on appeal. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 56.01(d)(2) (Vernon 2002); see also D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d at 298. If the juvenile and his parents or guardians are indigent, the juvenile is entitled to (1) court-appointed counsel on appeal; and (2) preparation of the clerk’s and reporter’s records without charge. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 56.01(d)(3), (m), § 56.02(b) (Vernon 2002); In re K.C.A., 36 S.W.3d 501, 502-03 (Tex.2000) (per curiam).

It cannot be determined at this juncture whether A.G. and his parent are presently indigent. Therefore, we will abate this appeal pending a hearing in the trial court to determine whether A.G. and his parent are indigent.

If the trial court finds that they are indigent, the court shall appoint counsel to represent A.G. See Tex. Fajvi.Code Ann. § 56.01(d)(3). If the trial court determines that they are not indigent, the court shall advise them: (1) they may have the trial court’s indigence ruling reviewed by filing a motion with this Court; see K.C.A., 36 S.W.3d at 502; In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738-39 (Tex.1998) (per curiam) (orig.proceeding); (2) A.G. may pursue the appeal without the assistance of counsel “through a parent, legal guardian, next friend, or guardian ad litem”; see D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d at 299; see also Tex. FaM.Code Ann. § 51.11 (Vernon 2002), § 151.001(a)(7) (Vernon Supp.2005); (3) they may retain other counsel to represent A.G. on appeal; and (4) they must, within fourteen days after the date of the hearing, notify the Clerk of this Court in writing of which of these options they intend to pursue.

The trial court shall, within thirty days after the date of this Order: (1) conduct the hearing; (2) cause a court reporter to make a record of the hearing; (3) make appropriate orders and findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (4) deliver any orders and findings of fact and conclusions of law to the trial court clerk.

If the trial court determines that A.G. and his parents are indigent, then the clerk’s record (including any orders and findings prepared in connection with the indigence hearing) and the reporter’s record (including a transcription of the indigence hearing) shall be filed within fifty days after the date of this Order.

Chief Justice GRAY would deny the motion to withdraw and order counsel to file a brief. Accordingly, without a separate opinion, Chief Justice GRAY dissents to this abatement order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in the Matter of K. J., a Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Terry Ray James v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
In Re AG
195 S.W.3d 886 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.W.3d 886, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ag-texapp-2006.