Home/New York Court of Appeals/Imperatrice v. Imperatrice

Imperatrice v. Imperatrice

81 N.E.2d 95, 298 N.Y. 549
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 16, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 81 N.E.2d 95 (Imperatrice v. Imperatrice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Imperatrice v. Imperatrice, 81 N.E.2d 95, 298 N.Y. 549 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

*550 Per Curiam.

Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants’ motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action,' nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.

The order should be affirmed, costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.

LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoNd, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur; CoNway, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arrow Agency, Inc. v. Terry
24 A.D.2d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Chudoba v. Chudoba
36 Misc. 2d 213 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
City of Albany v. McMorran
34 Misc. 2d 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Arouri v. Schwartz
16 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Bugeja v. Davis
33 Misc. 2d 76 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Bistrim v. Bridge
28 Misc. 2d 816 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Olin v. Town of North Hempstead
11 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Kriger v. Industrial Rehabilitation Corp.
8 A.D.2d 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Baldwin v. City of Buffalo
15 Misc. 2d 607 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Ferrare
6 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Solazzo v. Occhino
4 Misc. 2d 630 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Simmons v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
132 F. Supp. 370 (District of Columbia, 1955)
Interstate Operating Co. v. O. P. G. Recreation Center, Inc.
279 A.D. 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Heinzelman v. Union News Co.
92 N.E.2d 37 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Matter of Farrell
81 N.E.2d 51 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.E.2d 95, 298 N.Y. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/imperatrice-v-imperatrice-ny-1948.